Lance Stephenson will play for the Clippers next season after being dealt west for Matt Barnes and Spencer Hawes. While the “Born Ready” former Pacer struggled mightily in his sole season in Charlotte, he didn’t hesitate to call out his new team for a lack of toughness last year when they squandered a 3-1 lead in the Conference Semifinals to the Rockets.
“I feel like last year they weren’t as tough,” Stephenson told Ben Bolch of the Los Angeles Times. “They needed that guy to get them angry and get everybody mad and get other people scared. I feel like I could add on to that.”
Doc Rivers, the coach and GM who brought Lance aboard, was optimistic about the trade, despite his year in Charlotte. “It’s a risk if you go by one year,” Rivers told Bolch. “But I don’t know if it’s a risk if you go by body of work over his career.”
Stephenson also attempted to explain why he can often come off as a boorish teammate more likely to show up his on-court collaborators rather than take some of the blame for a blown play.
“When I’m on the court, I’ve got that type of energy where it looks like I’m yelling at somebody,” Lance said. “But I feel like when I talk to my teammates, it amps them and makes them work harder.”
We’re not sure what’s more obtuse. The people who claim Stephenson is a HUGE upgrade over Matt Barnes (or even Spencer Hawes, who Doc totally abandoned before throwing him in during the playoffs), or the fact Lance decided to call out his future teammates for a lack of toughness before he’d even suited up for them.
Stephenson shot 17.1 percent from beyond the three-point arc last season. Barnes shot a respectable 36.2 percent before falling off a cliff when the playoffs started. Here’s a side-by-side comparison of the two last season.
Yes, he had a higher usage than Barnes. The Clippers two-guard was just needed in a 3&D role with Blake Griffin, Chris Paul and J.J. Redick handling the majority of the offensive load. But let’s not forget just how awful Stephenson was last season.
It’s worth mentioning Lance was ranked No. 100 (out of 101 shooting guards) in offensive real plus-minus last season. Even worse, he was dead last (No. 101) in WAR (The estimated number of team wins attributable to each player, based on real plus-minus). Barnes, who ESPN listed as a small forward, was ranked No. 15 (out of 86 candidates) in offensive real plus-minus. He was No. 6 at small forward in WAR.
In case you forgot, real plus-minus is a step beyond a player’s regular plus-minus, with surrounding talent taken into account before arriving at a set number. The same could be said for the WAR because it uses real plus-minus to attribute a number of wins to a player.
According to those calculations, Stephenson was the worst shooting guard in the entire Association last year. Barnes, in contrast, was one of the most efficient small forwards. True, the Clippers are a much better team than the Hornets, but that’s why we’re looking at real plus-minus, which takes that divide into account.
Stephenson knows that the Clippers are better, too. Here’s how he reacted when he heard about the trade:
“I was like, ‘What? Are you serious? Like, I’m on the Clippers?’ I was very happy.”
So, why question their toughness? Why did Stephenson lob a grenade into the foxhole he’s about to climb into?
On top of the empirical data denigrating his game, and complimenting Barnes, Stephenson’s belief that the Clippers needed someone to “get everybody mad and get other people scared,” forgets that Barnes is basically the personification of that player.
Matt cursed out James Harden’s mom in the Conference Semifinals, and he’s ebbing closer to a professional on-court troll at this point, but with a better jump shot than Stephenson.
This is a really bad way for Lance to start his tenure in L.A., but if we’re grading on a curve, it’s about par for the course.